SynthDocBench: Controlled Benchmark for Long-Context Visual Document Understanding
Abstract
Vision language models (VLMs) have achieved strong performance on visual document understanding benchmarks such as DocVQA, ChartQA, and MMLongBench-Doc. However, real-world documents combine multiple factors such as length, layout complexity, modality, and question difficulty, which makes it difficult to attribute model failures to specific causes. We introduce SynthDocBench, a fully synthetic benchmark for long-context visual document understanding that systematically controls factors including document length, layout structure, modality composition, and question type. The benchmark is constructed using a combinatorial design, each factor is varied independently across generated documents, enabling controlled analysis of model behavior. Documents are generated end to end using an LLM pipeline across six layout archetypes, with a 40 percent random override to prevent models from exploiting spurious correlations. Additionally, SynthDocBench spans long-context documents with substantially greater length and structural diversity than existing benchmarks. Evaluating seven frontier VLMs, we uncover three failure modes that existing benchmarks cannot surface: sharp degradation with document length, a systematic positional sensitivity in which the middle third of a document is hardest for five of six models and five of six models show a negative Early-to-Late trend (steepest decline: 8.3 percentage points), and breakdown of chart comprehension in long-document settings. These results suggest that current models may be overfitting to benchmark artifacts rather than achieving robust long-context visual document understanding.
Community
Long-context visual document understanding benchmarks often entangle document length, layout, modality, and reasoning difficulty, making it difficult to diagnose why vision-language models fail.
We introduce SynthDocBench, a controlled synthetic benchmark for long-context visual document understanding that independently varies these factors across 200 reports (51 pages on average) and 1,788 questions covering chart reading, cross-modal reasoning, and multi-hop reasoning. Evaluating eight frontier VLMs reveals three consistent failure modes: (1) performance degrades with increasing reasoning complexity and document length, (2) most models exhibit a strong lost-in-the-middle positional bias, and (3) chart understanding breaks down in long-document settings even for state-of-the-art models. We hope SynthDocBench serves as a diagnostic benchmark for advancing long-context multimodal reasoning.
Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.10400
GitHub: https://github.com/ServiceNow/SynthDocBench
Dataset: https://huggingface.co/datasets/ServiceNow-AI/SynthDocBench
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2607.10400 Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper
Collections including this paper 0
No Collection including this paper