Multi-Head Latent Control: A Unified Interface for LLM Agent Decision Making
Abstract
Large language models are increasingly deployed as agents, but reliable agentic behavior requires more than next-token prediction. At inference time, it is preferred that an agent can decide whether to proceed with its current reasoning, defer to a stronger model, request additional information, invoke external tools, or abstain under the given setup. Existing approaches address these decisions through prompt-level routing, external orchestration, or task-specific fine-tuning, which primarily rely on input-side signals, and are often costly and difficult to maintain as model backbones evolve. We ask whether such control decisions can be inferred directly from a model's latent generation process. We introduce Multi-Head Latent Control, a lightweight layer that reads hidden-state trajectories from a frozen LLM or VLM to produce deployment-time control signals. A Capability Head predicts whether the current model can solve the instance or should defer to a stronger collaborator, while a Resolution Head predicts appropriate resolution decision Clarification, Tool Use, Abstention, or Direct Answering. Both heads are trained only on latent traces from the same frozen LLM backbone, enabling post hoc adaptation without modifying the model. Across language and vision-language settings, Multi-Head Latent Control consistently improves the quality-cost tradeoff of multi-model systems, enabling early handoff from partial generations and more accurate intervention decisions. In routed execution (small + large model), it reduces large-model usage by up to 90.7 percent on AndroidWorld and 27-53 percent on average across benchmarks, while retaining most of large-model performance. Additionally, the learned control signals improve tool-use decision quality, yielding up to +158 percent relative score gain and 65.5 percent fewer missed-required tool calls.
Community
Dynamic latent-state control heads for LLMs: route each query by actual model capability, not task type, to answer, reason, call tools, abstain, or escalate
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- MPCoT: Reward-Guided Multi-Path Latent Reasoning for Test-Time Scalable Vision-Language-Action (2026)
- SoftSkill: Behavioral Compression for Contextual Adaptation (2026)
- Context-Aware RL for Agentic and Multimodal LLMs (2026)
- From Verdict to Process: Agentic Reinforcement Learning for Multi-Stage Fact Verification (2026)
- MemoHarness: Agent Harnesses That Learn from Experience (2026)
- LLM Agents Are Latent Context Managers: Eliciting Self-Managed Context via State Proprioception (2026)
- When Evidence is Sparse: Weakly Supervised Early Failure Alerting in Dialogs and LLM-Agent Trajectories (2026)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2607.14277 Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash Models citing this paper 12
AmirhoseinGH/mhlc-capability-head-qwen3vl-2b-thinking
Datasets citing this paper 9
AmirhoseinGH/mhlc-training-qwen3vl-qwen3_vl_4b_instruct_hard_mixed_sources_120k
AmirhoseinGH/mhlc-training-qwen3.5-qwen3_5_9b_think_off_hard_mixed_sources_120k
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper