BRAIDBERTa
BRAIDBERTa is the first pretrained language model for BRAID, a molecular notation in which every valid string decodes to a valid molecule.
Compared against a matched SMILES baseline on BBBP, BRAID achieves statistically indistinguishable ROC-AUC while guaranteeing valid decoding.
The BRAID notation
BRAID (Branch-counted, Relative-ring, Attachment-native, Invalid-free, Dense) is built from four mechanisms, all of which are recombined prior art:
| Mechanism | Syntax | Borrowed from |
|---|---|---|
Organic-subset lexing, [...] only when needed |
C, Cl, [N+] |
SMILES |
| Length-counted branches (no parentheses) | >k then k atoms |
SELFIES branch counts |
| Relative ring closure (no paired digits) | ^d = bond d atoms back |
DeepSMILES relative rings |
| Fragment separator, global index continues across it | . |
SAFE |
Only atom tokens advance the global index; >k, ^d, bond symbols and . do not.
aspirin SMILES CC(=O)Oc1ccccc1C(=O)O
BRAID CC>1=OOcccccc^5C>1=OO (aromatic mode)
BRAID CC>1=OOC=CC=CC=C^5C>1=OO (kekulé mode, default)
Novelty: none claimed
BRAID is not novel at the mechanism level. Relative ring closure is DeepSMILES (O'Boyle & Dalke, 2018). Length-counted branches are the SELFIES branch-count idea (Krenn et al., 2020) with the brackets stripped. Guaranteed-valid decoding via a valence state machine is the entire point of SELFIES. The fragment separator is SAFE (Noutahi et al., 2023).
Please treat BRAID as a recombination.
The property BRAID does have
Every string decodes. On 10,000 random and mutated strings, the decoder produced a sanitizable molecule with 0 crashes. This is achieved by making the decoder total: unparseable tokens and over-valent bonds become silent no-ops. Validity is guaranteed.
Under an order-k Markov generator on a 79-molecule corpus:
| representation | valid% | unique% | novel% | vocab | tok/mol |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMILES | 40.0 | 38.4 | 34.0 | 24 | 13.6 |
| DeepSMILES | 35.4 | 46.9 | 42.4 | 27 | 13.3 |
| SELFIES | 100.0 | 59.6 | 57.9 | 29 | 12.9 |
| BRAID | 100.0 | 60.9 | 59.2 | 30 | 13.2 |
A Markov model is far weaker than a real CLM, so treat validity% as the meaningful (model-independent) signal and uniqueness/novelty as illustrative.
Model details
- Architecture: RoBERTa (masked language modelling)
- Pretraining corpus: ZINC 100k, encoded in BRAID
- Tokenizer: BPE trained on the BRAID corpus
- Objective: MLM
Downstream evaluation: BBBP
Finetuned for binary classification (blood–brain barrier penetration) with a fresh 2-logit head and cross-entropy loss. Hyperparameters (learning rate, epochs) were selected by Optuna on the validation split, then the best configuration was retrained across 5 seeds. Metric is test ROC-AUC.
| Model | Notation | BBBP ROC-AUC | Seed 0 | Seed 1 | Seed 2 | Seed 3 | Seed 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRAIDBERTa-v9 | BRAID | 0.725 ± 0.017 | 0.727 | 0.710 | 0.751 | 0.710 | 0.727 |
| SMILES control | SMILES | 0.720 ± 0.010 | 0.719 | 0.738 | 0.715 | 0.714 | 0.712 |
(± is the sample standard deviation across seeds.)
Interpretation
The two are statistically indistinguishable. Welch's t-test on the five seeds per model gives t ≈ 0.61, p ≈ 0.56. The 0.005 gap in favour of BRAID sits well inside seed noise, and the per-seed ranges overlap almost completely (BRAID 0.710–0.751, control 0.712–0.738).
The correct reading is
Under matched pretraining and finetuning, BRAID's guaranteed-validity property comes at no measurable cost to downstream predictive performance on BBBP.
Note: The seed-to-seed spread (±0.017) exceeds the between-model difference. Any comparison at this scale reporting a single seed is measuring noise.
Usage
The model consumes BRAID strings, not SMILES, so you need the codec:
pip install rdkit transformers
pip install git+https://github.com/AayushK-othari/braid.git
from braids import smiles_to_braid
from transformers import AutoTokenizer, AutoModelForSequenceClassification
tok = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained("aakothari/BRAIDBERTa-v9")
model = AutoModelForSequenceClassification.from_pretrained(
"aakothari/BRAIDBERTa-v9", num_labels=2
)
braid = smiles_to_braid("CC(=O)Oc1ccccc1C(=O)O") # -> CC>1=OOC=CC=CC=C^5C>1=OO
inputs = tok(braid, return_tensors="pt", truncation=True, max_length=128)
logits = model(**inputs).logits
Do not feed raw SMILES to this tokenizer. It will not error — BPE always backs off to characters — it will simply produce a meaningless tokenization and a plausible-looking, wrong prediction. Always encode with
smiles_to_braidfirst.
Encode in the same mode the model was pretrained in. The codec has Kekulé (default) and
aromatic modes, and they produce different strings for the same molecule
(C=CC=CC=C^5 vs cccccc^5). Mixing modes between pretraining and inference silently
degrades performance.
The reference implementation — encoder, decoder, valence state machine, stereo handling,
tokenizer/Vocab builder, and the test suites — lives at
github.com/aakothari/braids.
Verified codec behaviour
- Round-trip: 42/42 molecules recover their constitution in both Kekulé and aromatic modes — including fused/bridged systems (naphthalene, indole, adamantane, caffeine, purine, quinoline, nicotine) and ions (nitromethane, acetate, ammonium, Na⁺·Cl⁻).
- Stereo: 26/26 chiral / E-Z molecules round-trip in both modes — L-alanine, (S)-ibuprofen, meso vs. L-tartaric acid, menthol, L-DOPA, adrenaline, carvone, fumaric/maleic acid, conjugated dienes, mixed chiral + E/Z.
- Validity: 10,000/10,000 random and mutated strings decode to a sanitizable molecule with 0 crashes.
Limitations
Stereochemistry is partial. Tetrahedral chirality and E/Z double bonds round-trip on 26/26 test cases. Allene/axial/planar chirality, atropisomers, and non-tetrahedral stereo centres fall back to unspecified.
The valence state machine is approximate. A hand-rolled charge→valence rule, correct for common ions but liable to mis-clamp hypervalent, organometallic, or unusual-charge atoms. It is not a substitute for RDKit's model.
Insertion/deletion is non-local. Inserting or deleting an atom shifts every
^dthat spans the edit point. Inherent to relative back-references; applies equally to DeepSMILES.Not a canonical hash. One molecule has many valid BRAID strings. The encoder uses RDKit canonical-rank rooting for determinism, but uniqueness is not proven.
Citation
BRAID is a recombination of published mechanisms. Please cite the underlying work:
- O'Boyle, N. & Dalke, A. DeepSMILES: An Adaptation of SMILES for Use in Machine-Learning of Chemical Structures. ChemRxiv, 2018.
- Krenn, M. et al. Self-Referencing Embedded Strings (SELFIES): A 100% robust molecular string representation. Machine Learning: Science and Technology, 2020.
- Noutahi, E. et al. Gotta be SAFE: A New Framework for Molecular Design. 2023.
- Weininger, D. SMILES, a chemical language and information system. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 1988.
- Downloads last month
- 46