ajibawa-2023/Stitched-Reasoning-Trajectories-7M
Viewer • Updated • 5.04M • 862 • 5
Carlo Moro
cnmoro
AI & ML interests
None yet
Recent Activity
liked a dataset about 8 hours ago
ajibawa-2023/Stitched-Reasoning-Trajectories-7M liked a model about 21 hours ago
z-lab/Qwen3.5-35B-A3B-PARO liked a model 1 day ago
LH-Tech-AI/TinyMozart_v2_85MOrganizations
liked a
dataset about 8 hours ago
liked a
model about 21 hours ago
liked a
model 1 day ago
liked a
model 4 days ago
liked a
model 5 days ago
liked 2
models 10 days ago
reacted to SeaWolf-AI's post with 🔥 13 days ago
Post
8707
🧬 Introducing Darwin-9B-NEG — the first model with Native Entropy Gating (NEG)
🔗 Try it now: FINAL-Bench/Darwin-9B-NEG
🔗 Q4 bit : FINAL-Bench/Darwin-9B-MFP4
We're thrilled to release Darwin-9B-NEG, a 9B-parameter reasoning model
that embeds an architecturally-internalised sense of self-confidence directly
into the transformer — our proprietary Native Entropy Gating (NEG) technology.
📊 GPQA Diamond (198 PhD-level questions):
▸ Baseline Darwin-9B (no NEG) → 51.01 %
▸ Pure NEG (greedy · 1× cost) → 63.64 % 🔥 +12.63 %p
▸ + Permutation (4× cost) → 76.26 %
▸ + Ensemble Refinement (~20×) → 84.34 % 🏆
With only 9 billion parameters and 1× inference cost, Pure NEG jumps
+12.63 %p over the same model without NEG. Going all-in with ensemble
refinement pushes it to 84.34 % — surpassing the published Qwen3.5-9B
leaderboard score (81.7 %) by +2.64 %p.
🔬 What makes NEG different from Multi-Turn Iteration (MTI)?
Classical MTI needs 3-8× extra inference passes. NEG instead lives
INSIDE the single decoding loop. Two tiny modules ride with the
transformer: NEG-Head predicts per-token entropy from the last hidden
state, and NEG-Gate conditionally restricts the top-k choice when
confidence is low. The gate activates in only 4.36 % of tokens —
essentially free at inference time.
✨ Key differentiators
• Architecturally internalised — model file *is* the feature
• 1× inference cost (vs. 3-8× for MTI)
• Drop-in with vLLM / SGLang / TGI / transformers — no extra engine
• +12.63 %p reasoning at zero latency overhead
• Single-file deployment, Apache 2.0 licensed
🧬 Lineage
Qwen/Qwen3.5-9B → Darwin-9B-Opus (V7 evolutionary merge) → Darwin-9B-NEG (V8 + NEG training)
#Darwin #NEG #NativeEntropyGating #GPQA #Reasoning #LLM #OpenSource #Apache2
🔗 Try it now: FINAL-Bench/Darwin-9B-NEG
🔗 Q4 bit : FINAL-Bench/Darwin-9B-MFP4
We're thrilled to release Darwin-9B-NEG, a 9B-parameter reasoning model
that embeds an architecturally-internalised sense of self-confidence directly
into the transformer — our proprietary Native Entropy Gating (NEG) technology.
📊 GPQA Diamond (198 PhD-level questions):
▸ Baseline Darwin-9B (no NEG) → 51.01 %
▸ Pure NEG (greedy · 1× cost) → 63.64 % 🔥 +12.63 %p
▸ + Permutation (4× cost) → 76.26 %
▸ + Ensemble Refinement (~20×) → 84.34 % 🏆
With only 9 billion parameters and 1× inference cost, Pure NEG jumps
+12.63 %p over the same model without NEG. Going all-in with ensemble
refinement pushes it to 84.34 % — surpassing the published Qwen3.5-9B
leaderboard score (81.7 %) by +2.64 %p.
🔬 What makes NEG different from Multi-Turn Iteration (MTI)?
Classical MTI needs 3-8× extra inference passes. NEG instead lives
INSIDE the single decoding loop. Two tiny modules ride with the
transformer: NEG-Head predicts per-token entropy from the last hidden
state, and NEG-Gate conditionally restricts the top-k choice when
confidence is low. The gate activates in only 4.36 % of tokens —
essentially free at inference time.
✨ Key differentiators
• Architecturally internalised — model file *is* the feature
• 1× inference cost (vs. 3-8× for MTI)
• Drop-in with vLLM / SGLang / TGI / transformers — no extra engine
• +12.63 %p reasoning at zero latency overhead
• Single-file deployment, Apache 2.0 licensed
🧬 Lineage
Qwen/Qwen3.5-9B → Darwin-9B-Opus (V7 evolutionary merge) → Darwin-9B-NEG (V8 + NEG training)
#Darwin #NEG #NativeEntropyGating #GPQA #Reasoning #LLM #OpenSource #Apache2
liked 2
models 14 days ago
liked a
model 18 days ago
reacted to sergiopaniego's post with 🔥 21 days ago
Post
1324
Earlier this month, Apple introduced Simple Self-Distillation: a fine-tuning method that improves models on coding tasks just by sampling from the model and training on its own outputs with plain cross-entropy
And… it's already supported in TRL, built by Kashif Rasul. you can really feel the pace of development in the team 🐎
Paper by Ruixiang ZHANG, He Bai, Huangjie Zheng, Navdeep Jaitly, Ronan Collobert, Yizhe Zhang at Apple 🍎
How it works: the model generates completions at a training-time temperature (T_train) with top_k/top_p truncation, then fine-tunes on them with plain cross-entropy. no labels or verifier needed
You can try it right away with this ready-to-run example (Qwen3-4B on rStar-Coder):
https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/trl/experimental/ssd/ssd.py
or benchmark a checkpoint with the eval script:
https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/trl/experimental/ssd/ssd_eval.py
One neat insight from the paper: T_train and T_eval compose into an effective T_eff = T_train × T_eval, so a broad band of configs works well. even very noisy samples still help
Want to dig deeper?
Paper: Embarrassingly Simple Self-Distillation Improves Code Generation (2604.01193)
Trainer docs: https://huggingface.co/docs/trl/main/en/ssd_trainer
And… it's already supported in TRL, built by Kashif Rasul. you can really feel the pace of development in the team 🐎
Paper by Ruixiang ZHANG, He Bai, Huangjie Zheng, Navdeep Jaitly, Ronan Collobert, Yizhe Zhang at Apple 🍎
How it works: the model generates completions at a training-time temperature (T_train) with top_k/top_p truncation, then fine-tunes on them with plain cross-entropy. no labels or verifier needed
You can try it right away with this ready-to-run example (Qwen3-4B on rStar-Coder):
https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/trl/experimental/ssd/ssd.py
or benchmark a checkpoint with the eval script:
https://github.com/huggingface/trl/blob/main/trl/experimental/ssd/ssd_eval.py
One neat insight from the paper: T_train and T_eval compose into an effective T_eff = T_train × T_eval, so a broad band of configs works well. even very noisy samples still help
Want to dig deeper?
Paper: Embarrassingly Simple Self-Distillation Improves Code Generation (2604.01193)
Trainer docs: https://huggingface.co/docs/trl/main/en/ssd_trainer
liked a
model 22 days ago
updated a
model 23 days ago
liked a
model 24 days ago
liked 2
models 25 days ago
updated 2
models 25 days ago
published a
model 25 days ago