The dataset viewer is not available for this dataset.
Need help to make the dataset viewer work? Make sure to review how to configure the dataset viewer, and open a discussion for direct support.
PPTArena
PPTArena is a benchmark for agentic PowerPoint (.pptx) editing. Each case
gives a natural-language editing instruction and a source deck; a system must
edit the source so the result matches a human-authored ground-truth deck. It
measures whether agents can perform realistic, fine-grained slide edits — translation,
restyling, layout fixes, chart/table edits, transitions, master-level changes, and
more — while preserving everything they were not asked to change.
- Paper: arXiv:2512.03042
- Code & web app: https://github.com/michaelofengend/PPTArena
- Leaderboard https://ppt-arena.onrender.com/evaluation
- License: MIT
- Cases: 100 paired editing tasks (100 source + 100 ground-truth decks)
- Modality: binary Office files (
.pptx)
Dataset structure
PPTArena/
├── evaluation_pairs_refined.json # 100 cases: prompt + (original, ground_truth) pairs
├── Original/ *.pptx # 100 source decks to be edited
└── GroundTruth/ *.pptx # 100 human-authored target decks
The
.pptxfiles are binary Office documents. Usehuggingface_hub.snapshot_downloadto fetch them (see Usage).datasets.load_datasetis not the intended access path for the decks — it would return raw bytes rather than usable files. The JSON index is what joins each prompt to its file pair.
The index: evaluation_pairs_refined.json
A JSON array of 100 objects. Each object has:
| Key | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
name |
string | Human-readable case id, e.g. "Case 1: Translate to English But Keep French". |
prompt |
string | The editing instruction given to the agent. |
style_target |
string | Detailed description of the intended result (used for evaluation). |
original |
string | Path to the source deck, e.g. "Original/Foo_TestA.pptx". |
ground_truth |
string | Path to the target deck, e.g. "GroundTruth/Foo_GroundTruthA.pptx". |
category |
list[string] | High-level category, e.g. ["Content"], ["Layout"]. May contain more than one. |
edit_type |
string | Fine-grained edit type, e.g. "Text & Typography", "Charts". |
enhancement_notes |
string | Notes on how the case/target was refined. |
Categories (cases per category; a case may have more than one)
| Category | Count |
|---|---|
| Content | 67 |
| Layout | 29 |
| Styling | 29 |
| Structure | 15 |
| Interactivity | 4 |
Edit types (cases per type)
Text & Typography (29), Charts (10), Images & Pictures (10), Theme & Background (9), Alignment/Distribution/Z-order (8), Slide/Section Management & Footers (8), Tables (8), Shapes & Drawing (4), SmartArt & Diagrams (4), Slide Layout & Placeholders (3), Accessibility & Semantics (2), and one case each of Slide Transitions, Hyperlinks & Action Settings, Template & Master-Level Edits, Audio & Video, and Object Animations.
Usage
# pip install -U huggingface_hub
from huggingface_hub import snapshot_download
import json, os
# Download the whole benchmark (decks + index) into the HF cache.
local = snapshot_download(repo_id="<username>/PPTArena", repo_type="dataset")
# Load the 100-case index.
cases = json.load(open(os.path.join(local, "evaluation_pairs_refined.json")))
# Resolve a single case to absolute .pptx paths.
case = cases[0]
original = os.path.join(local, case["original"]) # the .pptx to edit
ground_truth = os.path.join(local, case["ground_truth"]) # the target .pptx
print(case["prompt"])
# `original` and `ground_truth` are real .pptx files: open them with python-pptx,
# feed them to an agent, etc.
# Optional: fetch only the index + source decks (skip ground truth) to save bandwidth:
# snapshot_download(repo_id="<username>/PPTArena", repo_type="dataset",
# allow_patterns=["*.json", "Original/*"])
Evaluation protocol
For each case: apply prompt to the deck at original, producing a candidate deck,
then compare the candidate against the deck at ground_truth (the style_target field
describes the intended outcome in detail). The benchmark rewards making exactly the
requested edit while preserving unrelated content, layout, and formatting. The paper
uses a dual VLM-as-judge pipeline scoring instruction-following and visual quality.
Citation
@article{ofengenden2025pptarena,
title = {PPTArena: A Benchmark for Agentic PowerPoint Editing},
author = {Ofengenden, Michael and Man, Yunze and Pang, Ziqi and Wang, Yu-Xiong},
journal = {arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.03042},
year = {2025}
}
License
Released under the MIT License.
- Downloads last month
- 452