Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
tool
stringclasses
6 values
dataset
stringclasses
10 values
modality
stringclasses
4 values
metric
stringlengths
7
16
value
float64
0
44.6
n
float64
800
57.7k
train_status
stringclasses
4 values
notes
stringclasses
13 values
pyfeat_v2
disfaplus
au
f1_mean
0.5396
57,150
out_of_sample
truth>=2, prob>=0.5; 12 AU
pyfeat_v2
disfaplus
au
f1_AU01
0.7837
57,150
out_of_sample
null
pyfeat_v2
disfaplus
au
f1_AU02
0.5674
57,150
out_of_sample
null
pyfeat_v2
disfaplus
au
f1_AU04
0.7079
57,150
out_of_sample
null
pyfeat_v2
disfaplus
au
f1_AU05
0.5788
57,150
out_of_sample
null
pyfeat_v2
disfaplus
au
f1_AU06
0.5858
57,150
out_of_sample
null
pyfeat_v2
disfaplus
au
f1_AU09
0.8252
57,150
out_of_sample
null
pyfeat_v2
disfaplus
au
f1_AU12
0.559
57,150
out_of_sample
null
pyfeat_v2
disfaplus
au
f1_AU15
0.649
57,150
out_of_sample
null
pyfeat_v2
disfaplus
au
f1_AU17
0.2816
57,150
out_of_sample
null
pyfeat_v2
disfaplus
au
f1_AU20
0.0119
57,150
out_of_sample
null
pyfeat_v2
disfaplus
au
f1_AU25
0.6682
57,150
out_of_sample
null
pyfeat_v2
disfaplus
au
f1_AU26
0.2563
57,150
out_of_sample
null
pyfeat_v1
disfaplus
au
f1_mean
0.2503
57,150
out_of_sample
truth>=2, prob>=0.5; 12 AU
pyfeat_v1
disfaplus
au
f1_AU01
0.3393
57,150
out_of_sample
null
pyfeat_v1
disfaplus
au
f1_AU02
0.2361
57,150
out_of_sample
null
pyfeat_v1
disfaplus
au
f1_AU04
0.429
57,150
out_of_sample
null
pyfeat_v1
disfaplus
au
f1_AU05
0
57,150
out_of_sample
null
pyfeat_v1
disfaplus
au
f1_AU06
0.3213
57,150
out_of_sample
null
pyfeat_v1
disfaplus
au
f1_AU09
0.1334
57,150
out_of_sample
null
pyfeat_v1
disfaplus
au
f1_AU12
0.3927
57,150
out_of_sample
null
pyfeat_v1
disfaplus
au
f1_AU15
0.1179
57,150
out_of_sample
null
pyfeat_v1
disfaplus
au
f1_AU17
0.1368
57,150
out_of_sample
null
pyfeat_v1
disfaplus
au
f1_AU20
0.096
57,150
out_of_sample
null
pyfeat_v1
disfaplus
au
f1_AU25
0.6813
57,150
out_of_sample
null
pyfeat_v1
disfaplus
au
f1_AU26
0.1202
57,150
out_of_sample
null
openface3
disfaplus
au
f1_mean
0.4882
57,668
out_of_sample
8 AU predicted; missing AU treated as 0 over 12
openface3
disfaplus
au
f1_AU01
0.8476
57,668
out_of_sample
null
openface3
disfaplus
au
f1_AU02
0.6899
57,668
out_of_sample
null
openface3
disfaplus
au
f1_AU04
0.8354
57,668
out_of_sample
null
openface3
disfaplus
au
f1_AU06
0.4202
57,668
out_of_sample
null
openface3
disfaplus
au
f1_AU09
0.8016
57,668
out_of_sample
null
openface3
disfaplus
au
f1_AU12
0.7375
57,668
out_of_sample
null
openface3
disfaplus
au
f1_AU25
0.9338
57,668
out_of_sample
null
openface3
disfaplus
au
f1_AU26
0.5919
57,668
out_of_sample
null
libreface
disfaplus
au
f1_mean
0.4614
57,150
out_of_sample
research RepVGG; truth>=2, intensity>=2; 12 AU
libreface
disfaplus
au
f1_AU01
0.7031
57,150
out_of_sample
null
libreface
disfaplus
au
f1_AU02
0.7057
57,150
out_of_sample
null
libreface
disfaplus
au
f1_AU04
0.7462
57,150
out_of_sample
null
libreface
disfaplus
au
f1_AU05
0.6256
57,150
out_of_sample
null
libreface
disfaplus
au
f1_AU06
0.1116
57,150
out_of_sample
null
libreface
disfaplus
au
f1_AU09
0.7505
57,150
out_of_sample
null
libreface
disfaplus
au
f1_AU12
0.5632
57,150
out_of_sample
null
libreface
disfaplus
au
f1_AU15
0.0671
57,150
out_of_sample
null
libreface
disfaplus
au
f1_AU17
0.0648
57,150
out_of_sample
null
libreface
disfaplus
au
f1_AU20
0.0061
57,150
out_of_sample
null
libreface
disfaplus
au
f1_AU25
0.9065
57,150
out_of_sample
null
libreface
disfaplus
au
f1_AU26
0.2869
57,150
out_of_sample
null
libreface
disfaplus
au
pcc_AU01
0.7296
57,150
out_of_sample
null
libreface
disfaplus
au
pcc_AU02
0.7157
57,150
out_of_sample
null
libreface
disfaplus
au
pcc_AU04
0.8852
57,150
out_of_sample
null
libreface
disfaplus
au
pcc_AU05
0.8449
57,150
out_of_sample
null
libreface
disfaplus
au
pcc_AU06
0.7509
57,150
out_of_sample
null
libreface
disfaplus
au
pcc_AU09
0.8643
57,150
out_of_sample
null
libreface
disfaplus
au
pcc_AU12
0.8451
57,150
out_of_sample
null
libreface
disfaplus
au
pcc_AU15
0.5913
57,150
out_of_sample
null
libreface
disfaplus
au
pcc_AU17
0.6065
57,150
out_of_sample
null
libreface
disfaplus
au
pcc_AU20
0.2439
57,150
out_of_sample
null
libreface
disfaplus
au
pcc_AU25
0.9421
57,150
out_of_sample
null
libreface
disfaplus
au
pcc_AU26
0.7767
57,150
out_of_sample
null
pyafar
disfaplus
au
f1_mean_7au
0.2597
57,150
out_of_sample
7 of 12 AU overlap; occ>=0.5 vs truth>=2
pyafar
disfaplus
au
f1_AU01
0.0031
57,150
out_of_sample
null
pyafar
disfaplus
au
f1_AU02
0.398
57,150
out_of_sample
null
pyafar
disfaplus
au
f1_AU04
0
57,150
out_of_sample
null
pyafar
disfaplus
au
f1_AU06
0.6067
57,150
out_of_sample
null
pyafar
disfaplus
au
f1_AU12
0.5483
57,150
out_of_sample
null
pyafar
disfaplus
au
f1_AU15
0.1257
57,150
out_of_sample
null
pyafar
disfaplus
au
f1_AU17
0.1364
57,150
out_of_sample
null
pyfeat_v2
affectnet_val
emotion
accuracy
0.4919
992
held_out
null
pyfeat_v2
affectnet_val
emotion
f1_macro
0.4787
992
held_out
null
pyfeat_v2
affectnet_val
valence_arousal
valence_ccc
0.5349
992
held_out
null
pyfeat_v2
affectnet_val
valence_arousal
arousal_ccc
0.4822
992
held_out
null
pyfeat_v2
raf_test
emotion
accuracy
0.6555
3,019
held_out
null
pyfeat_v2
raf_test
emotion
f1_macro
0.5275
3,019
held_out
null
pyfeat_v2
columbia_gaze
gaze
angular_mae_deg
2.721
1,176
in_sample
a=pitch,b=yaw;sign_pitch=1;sign_yaw=-1;unit=rad
pyfeat_v2
ethxgaze
gaze
angular_mae_deg
44.566
2,763
out_of_sample
a=pitch,b=yaw;sign_pitch=-1;sign_yaw=1;unit=rad
pyfeat_v2
eyediap
gaze
angular_mae_deg
19.975
800
out_of_sample
a=pitch,b=yaw;sign_pitch=-1;sign_yaw=1;unit=rad
pyfeat_v2
eyediap_norm
gaze
angular_mae_deg
19.418
800
out_of_sample
a=pitch,b=yaw;sign_pitch=-1;sign_yaw=1;unit=rad
pyfeat_v2
gaze360
gaze
angular_mae_deg
9.416
2,425
held_out
a=pitch,b=yaw;sign_pitch=1;sign_yaw=1;unit=rad
pyfeat_v2
mpiifacegaze
gaze
angular_mae_deg
2.802
3,000
in_sample
a=pitch,b=yaw;sign_pitch=1;sign_yaw=-1;unit=rad
pyfeat_v2
mpiigaze
gaze
reported_mae_deg
3.92
null
unknown
au_deep v2.4 final (shipped ckpt v24fix_s3; self-reported, in-distribution)
pyfeat_v2
gaze360
gaze
reported_mae_deg
6.81
null
held_out
au_deep v2.4 final (shipped ckpt v24fix_s3; self-reported, in-distribution)
openface3
mpiifacegaze
gaze
reported_mae_deg
2.56
null
in_sample
OpenFace 3.0 paper (arXiv:2506.02891)
openface3
gaze360
gaze
reported_mae_deg
10.6
null
in_sample
OpenFace 3.0 paper (arXiv:2506.02891)
l2cs_net
mpiigaze
gaze
reported_mae_deg
3.92
null
unknown
L2CS-Net paper (arXiv:2203.03339); py-feat's gaze lineage
l2cs_net
gaze360
gaze
reported_mae_deg
10.41
null
unknown
L2CS-Net paper (arXiv:2203.03339); py-feat's gaze lineage
openface3
affectnet_val
emotion
accuracy
0.4929
980
held_out
null
openface3
affectnet_val
emotion
f1_macro
0.5198
980
held_out
null
openface3
raf_test
emotion
accuracy
0.5132
2,233
out_of_sample
null
openface3
raf_test
emotion
f1_macro
0.469
2,233
out_of_sample
null
openface3
columbia_gaze
gaze
angular_mae_deg
12.049
1,176
out_of_sample
a=pitch,b=yaw;sign_pitch=1;sign_yaw=1;unit=deg
openface3
ethxgaze
gaze
angular_mae_deg
37.702
2,477
out_of_sample
a=pitch,b=yaw;sign_pitch=1;sign_yaw=1;unit=rad
openface3
eyediap
gaze
angular_mae_deg
21.257
800
out_of_sample
a=pitch,b=yaw;sign_pitch=1;sign_yaw=1;unit=rad
openface3
eyediap_norm
gaze
angular_mae_deg
21.533
800
out_of_sample
a=pitch,b=yaw;sign_pitch=1;sign_yaw=1;unit=rad
openface3
gaze360
gaze
angular_mae_deg
41.091
2,397
in_sample
a=pitch,b=yaw;sign_pitch=-1;sign_yaw=1;unit=rad
openface3
mpiifacegaze
gaze
angular_mae_deg
7.027
2,879
in_sample
a=pitch,b=yaw;sign_pitch=1;sign_yaw=1;unit=rad
libreface
affectnet_val
emotion
accuracy
0.4553
984
held_out
null
libreface
affectnet_val
emotion
f1_macro
0.4026
984
held_out
null
libreface
raf_test
emotion
accuracy
0.6458
2,705
unknown
null
libreface
raf_test
emotion
f1_macro
0.3855
2,705
unknown
null
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio

py-feat benchmarks

Live benchmark data for py-feat and a cross-tool comparison against OpenFace 3.0, LibreFace, and PyAFAR. Powers the py-feat live dashboard. Updated by scheduled benchmark runs.

Files

File What
accuracy.csv Tidy long table: one row per (tool, dataset, modality, metric). Covers AU F1 (DISFA+), 7-class emotion (AffectNet-val, RAF-DB), valence/arousal CCC (AffectNet-val), and gaze angular error (Columbia).
throughput.csv py-feat detector frames/sec across hardware × batch.
cross_tool_methodology.md How every tool was run end-to-end, the feature matrix, dataset/protocol choices, and per-tool integration notes.
competitors/*.json Raw per-tool result JSONs (provenance for every number in accuracy.csv).

accuracy.csv columns

tool · dataset · modality (au / emotion / valence_arousal / gaze) · metric · value · n (samples scored) · notes.

Protocol in one paragraph

Every competitor runs end-to-end as shipped (its own face detector, its own models) on identical images/labels frozen into shared manifests — never as a py-feat dependency, each in its own isolated env. Held-out sets only (DISFA+, not DISFA, since DISFA trains several competitors). Emotion is scored on the 7 shared classes; gaze I/O conventions are resolved identically and in every tool's favor. See cross_tool_methodology.md for the full story, including what it took to get each competitor to run.

Downloads last month
-