Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
paper_id
stringlengths
10
10
prompt
listlengths
2
2
completion
listlengths
1
1
pred
float64
1
9
gt
float64
1
10
label
bool
1 class
yeeIGM3N6w
[ { "content": "\nYou will get a review of a paper and a set of retrieved anchor reviews, based on the anchor review, estimate the score of the paper under review. The score should be between 1 and 10, where 1 is the worst and 10 is the best. Round to the nearest .5 or .0. \n\nScoring rules:\n- Your final score m...
[ { "content": "Looking at the retrieved anchors, I first need to compare the paper under review (HC-SMoE) to these anchor papers to estimate its relative quality.\n\n**Comparison with anchors:**\n\n1. **MPG (Reject, avg 1.5)** - The MPG paper has fatal flaws: internal inconsistency, poorly motivated problem, noi...
6
5.5
true
eFWG9Cy3WK
[ { "content": "\nYou will get a review of a paper and a set of retrieved anchor reviews, based on the anchor review, estimate the score of the paper under review. The score should be between 1 and 10, where 1 is the worst and 10 is the best. Round to the nearest .5 or .0. \n\nScoring rules:\n- Your final score m...
[ { "content": "Let me analyze this paper review systematically by comparing it to each anchor review.\n\n**Comparing to Anchor 1 (Score: 1,1,1,3 - Strong Reject):**\nThis paper is significantly stronger than Anchor 1. Anchor 1 had serious conceptual inconsistencies, missing related work, problematic methodology ...
7.5
6.33
true
eFWG9Cy3WK
[ { "content": "\nYou will get a review of a paper and a set of retrieved anchor reviews, based on the anchor review, estimate the score of the paper under review. The score should be between 1 and 10, where 1 is the worst and 10 is the best. Round to the nearest .5 or .0. \n\nScoring rules:\n- Your final score m...
[ { "content": "Let me analyze the paper under review and compare it with each anchor review systematically.\n\n**Comparing to the anchor reviews:**\n\n1. **Anchor 1 (Scores: 3, 1, 1, 1 - Reject): MPG paper**\n- That paper had severe weaknesses: conceptual inconsistency, poor presentation, problematic metrics, mi...
7
6.33
true
3GurO0kRue
[{"content":"\nYou will get a review of a paper and a set of retrieved anchor reviews, based on the (...TRUNCATED)
[{"content":"Looking at the paper under review, I need to compare it carefully with each anchor pape(...TRUNCATED)
7.5
6.5
true
3GurO0kRue
[{"content":"\nYou will get a review of a paper and a set of retrieved anchor reviews, based on the (...TRUNCATED)
[{"content":"The paper under review tackles \"implicit subpopulation imbalance\" with a clever metho(...TRUNCATED)
7
6.5
true
3GurO0kRue
[{"content":"\nYou will get a review of a paper and a set of retrieved anchor reviews, based on the (...TRUNCATED)
[{"content":"The paper under review proposes **SHE** (Scatter and HarmonizE) to address **implicit s(...TRUNCATED)
7
6.5
true
6zcZQkjB3Q
[{"content":"\nYou will get a review of a paper and a set of retrieved anchor reviews, based on the (...TRUNCATED)
[{"content":"Let me go step-by-step and compare the paper under review (iReVa) to each anchor paper.(...TRUNCATED)
5
5
true
evDSvZBFRP
[{"content":"\nYou will get a review of a paper and a set of retrieved anchor reviews, based on the (...TRUNCATED)
[{"content":"The paper proposes using polynomial zonotopes, a non-convex set representation, for ver(...TRUNCATED)
5
4
true
evDSvZBFRP
[{"content":"\nYou will get a review of a paper and a set of retrieved anchor reviews, based on the (...TRUNCATED)
[{"content":"This paper proposes a novel method for transformer verification using polynomial zonoto(...TRUNCATED)
5
4
true
evDSvZBFRP
[{"content":"\nYou will get a review of a paper and a set of retrieved anchor reviews, based on the (...TRUNCATED)
[{"content":"The paper under review proposes a formal verification method for transformers using pol(...TRUNCATED)
5
4
true
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
Downloads last month
63